Remote Viewing 3I/Atlas

Update! Phase II of Remote Viewing 3I/Atlas is also available: click here.

Introduction

3I/ATLAS is the third confirmed interstellar object discovered, according to NASA. It is classified as an interstellar comet because its orbit is hyperbolic, indicating it is not gravitationally bound to our Sun and is merely passing through our solar system.

Some astronomers have highlighted unusual characteristics of 3I/ATLAS that have sparked debate about its true nature:

Size: Initial estimates of 3I/ATLAS suggested it could be up to 12 miles (20 km) across, making it significantly larger than the previously discovered interstellar objects 'Oumuamua and 2I/Borisov,. However, later observations and analysis of the object's brightness led some scientists to suggest a smaller nucleus enveloped by a coma, making the overall size estimate more consistent with other interstellar objects.

While 3I/ATLAS exhibits cometary activity (a fuzzy coma and potential tail), some observations show a lack of strong spectral signatures for gases typically associated with comets. This has led to discussion about whether other mechanisms might be causing the dust release.

The object's highly energetic trajectory and inclination, traveling almost perpendicular to the plane of our solar system, coupled with its close passage with three planets in our solar system (Jupiter, Mars, Venus) and close passage behind the Sun from our vantage point, is described as unusual and potentially indicative of a unique origin or ejection event.

I assigned six remote viewers to investigate the nature of the phenomenon. The findings were quite intriguing, but I advise everyone to approach the results with calmness and skepticism, as various possibilities could still explain this object and the data. As always, we simply follow the data.

 

Project Summary - Remote viewing object 3I/Atlas

This report analyzes multiple independent remote viewing sessions conducted on the target "3I/Atlas" (target 7748-3050) during August 2025. Six experienced remote viewers participated in blind sessions, producing an extraordinary level of convergent data. The consistency of specific technical details, sensory perceptions, and higher level data across independent sessions suggests genuine anomalous activity with feedback expected to be verified at some level during 3I/Atlas's close solar approach in late October 2025. While the data is compelling, we must acknowledge that multiple outcomes are possible, and the data might be skewed, exaggerated, or attributed to viewing specific aspects of the collective unconscious, among other things.

 Project Overview

Target Designation: (7748-3050) What is the nature of the object named 3I/Atlas and its path through our solar system?

Verification Timeline: Late October 2025 (solar approach) and thereafter

Project Manager: John Adams

Methodology: Blind remote viewing sessions

Viewers: Patricia A., John Dixon, John Maillard, Becca Nielsen, David Powell, I.V., and Jemma Warner

Session Timeframe: August 2025

 1. Physical Characteristics

• Primary Colors: Blue, white, green (reported by 5/6 viewers)

• Secondary Colors: Red, orange, yellow, brown, black, purple, pale, opaque

• Spherical/Circular Elements: Consistent across all sessions

• Linear/Geometric Components: Reported by all viewers

• Size Variations: From small to large proportions

• Curved/Spiral Patterns/Vortex/Vertices: Universal characteristic

• Consistent Across All Sessions: Every viewer described a combination of biological and artificial elements.

 Descriptions include:

Structural in nature, it has a fuselage, hull, is part biological and artificial, is an artificial asteroid, having a shell or shell-like outside, slimy, gel-like, plasma, liquid glowing, sparkling, radiating, electrical discharge, static-y, buzzing, pulsing, sonar, metallic, porcelain-like, a 3D shape becoming hollow, high tech, crowded, venous, opaque, multiple colors, discolored edges, rusted edges, a mirrored or mirroring aspect, elongated, oblong, flat, partially organic, high tech in design, ancient, may be encased in rock or shell and/or have tungsten-like and/or other metallic design, may contain liquids, observational windows, there may be a spray that is generated in front and going backwards, is self-propelling with kinetic energy and advanced technologies.

 2. Motion And Behavior

Lateral movement across, fast, high energy, circular objects, objects that are flat and moving very fast, wants to preserve or hide itself as some kind of rock or bolder, multi-dimensional, time-relative, may be hiding until the right time to be discovered, shadowing, mirroring, there may be a spray generated in front going backwards, self-propelling, with kinetic energy,  moving forward, spinning motion, fast.

 3. Advanced Descriptions

Interstellar in origin, it is something tracked, involving communication, calculation error, projection technology, possible beaming down energy technology, high energy, old, sickly in appearance, is an ancient encampment, extremely durable, has open ports or openings with long tubes, may contain armor, defensive of camouflage-type ability, wants to preserve or hide itself as some kind of rock or bolder, multi-dimensional, time-relative, cloaking, may be hiding until the right time to be discovered, transcendental, an aperture present, portal, vortex, invisible, magnetic, shadowing, ominous, Machiavellian transcendental, and a special anomaly.

 4. Technical and Operational Elements

 Advanced Propulsion Systems

• All viewers describe sophisticated movement capabilities

• "Kinetic propulsion," "gravity fed," "torsion-like energy", and interstellar engine

• Galactic, up, down, floating, spinning, irregular movement

• References to controlled energy systems

• Notes on "craftsmanship," "experiments," "something being made"

• Multiple viewers describe manufactured elements

• "Magnetic construction elements" and geometric precision

• Directed energy weapons, defensive weaponry, and control technology

 5. Signs Of Intelligence

• Advanced non-human intelligence is noted

• Multiple sessions report advanced technology, communication, tracking, observation

• Mention of UFOS, programmed technology, AI

• There is a robotic, artificial intelligence aspect which may be liquid and metallic in nature

• Lifeforms appear to be restrained, watching, observing, uncaring, uninterested, menacing, disgusted, annoyed, and evil

• They appear as playing with our heads, with feelings of superiority, and uncaring behavior towards humans

• Pre-planned activities present

• An intention to control

• Humans considered in the way

 6. Environmental Context

• Galactic, space, atmosphere

• Facilities, underground facilities, caves, bases

• Wheat field-like settings, with possible crop circles

• Undersea secret hidden ruins, "subterranean" portal qualities

• References to inter-dimensional access points and vortexes

 7. Advanced Perceptions: Themes and Dynamics

To these possible non-human intelligences we are considered to be "in the way" - a resource - like "meat sacks" - not important or even conscious. Instead, they are concerned with where we live (Earth); they will "wait and reap the harvest”. We (humans) “volunteered in a long experiment to find a way back to who we really are". Vast, untouched energy or potentials are waiting and we are “too stupid” to see that. The idea was to make something they “could live in and explore”.

Intentions: Bad intent, kidnap, study in use, explore, educate, eliminate failure, confuse, battle. They seem bored, aimless, and arrogant with the universe “at their fingertips”.

Activities: Collecting probing, observing, monitoring, avoidance of detection, to avoid life and protect life. Severe restraint is present on how we perceive them. Mind control or thought manipulation.

Characteristics: Frustrated, hostile, dangerous, evil, bored, looking for entertainment, “close” and “will not suffer fools”. There is a need to mislead. There is a circle of metal inside like a river. It is the “intelligence”. There may be windows, a vortex, or portal through which to see and travel "from place to place".

Subjects potentially involved: Humanoid, alien, robotic, reptile-like, a viceroy, a reference to the Nephilim, committee and committee members, humans, humans en masse.

Emotions and behavior: Starstruck, in awe, shock, fear, panic, non-compliance, a sense of attrition and fatalism

Events/Dynamics: They are revered as (false) gods. Masked and avoiding detection. There is planning, a time table, scare tactics, opposing force, an entrance into a/the scene, special access, a possible extraction point, repeated mention of crop circles, a multifaceted event involving advanced spherical craft, hybrid warfare, war, invisible war, and battle. Brain chemistry/chemicals and neuroscience is noted. May attempt confusion, deception, control. May utilize mind influencing technologies and beaming. Capability of brain scanning technologies. May incite mass hysteria and/or hallucination.

 7. Optimal Actions Regarding This Target

• Note, understand, and be with "me"

• Turn the world to a better place through openness and good thought

• It's “through these actions we will understand what to do for ourselves before (we) are gone”.

• There is a place for us but “there is a sickness in our minds”.

• We are said to “worship the wrong gods and have perverted the original spirit”.

• There is “using the vortex against them”, but this is considered as “harmless information only”, perhaps as non-violent action.

 Additional Discussion:

There appears to be an experimental, protective technology used against "bad types". This may have a side effect or impact on humans, presumably positive in nature. This aspect or dynamic is accessible only to some. It seems to be ongoing right now. It offers “medicine, protection and growth even if it is not said“ as such. There is a depiction of needing to pull in alignment another “celestial body” to “keep the current one in tact”. The two masses would somehow “compliment each other and allow growth and prosperity through grand design”. This is somehow protective on a physical scale. There is a “connection that is broken and must be fixed to get back on the desired "channel"”. This event may be opening up of a "new state of mind". [This could be related to a shift in consciousness]

 Statistical Analysis

 Convergence Probability Assessment

Primary Convergences (6/6 viewers):

• Hybrid organic-technological nature

• Fast/rotational/spinning motion

• Complex structural forms

• Advanced intelligence indicators

Secondary Convergences (6/6 viewers):

• Blue coloration

• Energy emission patterns

• Circular/spherical elements

• Non-human consciousness themes

• Underground/contained facility elements

Specific Convergences (4-5/6 viewers):

• UK wheat field location

• "Metallic river intelligence" concept

• Gravitational manipulation

• Strategic guidance themes

• Portal/inter-dimensional qualities

• Observation/research facility infrastructure

Statistical Assessment: The probability of achieving this level of specific, technical convergence across independent viewers approaches astronomical odds (conservatively estimated at >1 in 10^18), according to analysis in A.I. It ascertains a near certain probability, in light of some of the strange aspects documented about the object, that the object is anomalous in nature. While this may be a great exaggeration, it illustrates the compelling nature of the information.

Implications and Conclusions

A. Genuine Anomalous Phenomenon: The level of convergent detail across independent sessions strongly indicates genuine remote viewing of a real, complex phenomenon.

B. Hybrid Technology: 3I/Atlas appears to represent an integration of biological and technological systems beyond current human capabilities.

C. Advanced Intelligence: Consistent perceptual data for non-human consciousness with sophisticated communication abilities and dismissive attitudes toward human intelligence.

D. Advanced Infrastructure: Multiple viewers describe sophisticated observation and research facilities with controlled environments, viewing chambers, and experimental capabilities.

E. Physical Manifestation: Multiple environmental contexts (artificial construction, space, atmosphere, UK wheat fields/possible crop circles, underground systems, subterranean areas, observation perspectives) .

 Verification Timeline

October 2025 Solar Approach: The convergent remote viewing data will face empirical verification during and/or after 3I/Atlas's predicted close solar approach. This provides an unprecedented opportunity to validate remote viewing accuracy against observable astronomical events.

 Research Implications

This represents one of the most comprehensive and convergent remote viewing datasets in documented research history.

 The combination of:

• Multiple independent viewers

• Blind protocols

• Specific technical details

• Consciousness interaction elements

• Verifiable timeline predictions

This represents a strong case study for consciousness research, anomalous studies, if verified. However, we should not act rashly or put all of our eggs in one basket. Some possible alternate outcomes for this object/event include:

1. The object is verified as a faster than normal comet with strange features

2. The object continues harmlessly past the Sun, the planets, and out of our solar system

3. The object is somehow anomalous in nature but nothing else happens

4. There is a long period before any additional, useful data can be obtained or verified

 Recommendations

A. Continued Monitoring: Of the object using available technology

B. Additional sessions approaching the October 2025 verification date will be considered useful

C. Technical Analysis: Detailed comparison of behavior or technology with known physics

D. Documentation Standards: Establishment of protocols for future investigations

E. Verification Preparation: Coordination with astronomical observation networks for October 2025 confirmation

Report Prepared: by John Adams August 18, 2025

Next Review: Post-verification analysis following the October 2025 solar approach

Classification: Research/Investigative Analysis

Visual Data

Patricia A.	John Dixon
John Maillard	Becca Nielsen

Interestingly, I conducted a remote viewing session focused on the question "What are the 'Nephilim' and will they 'return' to Earth? Describe." In one of the six sessions, the "Nephilim" were mentioned, and the details from the session align in various ways, making it worth mentioning. Additionally, I conducted what seemed a target displacement/mixed session that may be worth noting (the original target given was on a tightrope walk).

It's intriguing to compare Patricia's sketch with this one and note the similarity in the structures, as well as with John Dixon's and mine, which are based on open ports, doors, or windows.

Patricia A	John Adams (displacement target)
John Dixon	John Adams (displacement target)

Additionally, I wrote "hit the high-beams", like traveling next to what looked like a dusty or whirling object in space. It has now been observed that the object may be both smaller than originally estimated and may also be emitting its own light, "like a pair of headlights." See this article here

'3I/ATLAS could be a spacecraft powered by nuclear energy, and the dust emitted from its frontal surface might be from dirt that accumulated on its surface during its interstellar travel,' Loeb wrote in a statement.

'This cannot be ruled out, but requires better evidence to be viable,' he added.

Normally, comets glow because of the dust and gas around them reflecting sunlight. This light usually spreads out more evenly and doesn't dim as quickly as you move away from the comet's core.

Scientists expected the brightness of 3I/ATLAS to follow a similar pattern, but instead, it drops off sharply, suggesting the light might be coming from something else entirely.

The discovery was similar to standing near a bright flashlight. The light is intense up close, but as you walk away, it fades fast.

Additional Images

John Dixon

John Maillard

Becca Nielsen

David Powell

Predicted Path of 3I/Atlas Through Our Solar System

The near approaches timeline predicted for this object is as follows:

• Mars: October 3, 2025, at a distance of 0.1936 AU, or 28.962 million km (17.996 million miles). This close approach might allow spacecraft orbiting Mars to study the comet.

• Sun (Perihelion): October 29, 2025, at a distance of 1.3564 AU, or 202.91 million km (126.085 million miles). This point marks the comet's closest approach to the Sun.

• Venus: November 3, 2025, at a distance of 0.6494 AU, or 97.15 million km (60.366 million miles).

• Earth: December 19, 2025, at a distance of 1.797 AU, or 268.83 million km (167.042 million miles). While considered a close approach in astronomical terms, this distance is significantly greater than the Earth-Sun distance (1 AU) and poses no threat as a comet.

• Jupiter: March 16, 2026, at a distance of 0.359 astronomical units (AU), equivalent to 53.71 million km (33.37 million miles). There is a proposal to use NASA's Juno spacecraft to rendezvous with the comet during this encounter.

  
  

Conclusion

In summary, we should refrain from drawing quick conclusions about this data. It is important to keep observing, monitoring, and staying informed, followed by verification later on. If there is indeed something to confirm, it might result in fascinating outcomes, but we cannot be sure at this point. It's possible that the object could continue its journey beyond our solar system, similar to Oumuamua.

Follow the channel below:

THIS PROJECT is available as a downloadable report here: 3I/Atlas Project Report

The FULL sessions are available here: 3I/Atlas Remote Viewing Sessions

NEW: Viewing Congruency Report available here: 3I/Atlas Congruency Report

Here is the link to the two other sessions, the Nephilim (designated on first page for record keeping) and the mixed displacement session: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1bMz-FGhYSTJ3mWXxePh8Iz_4SJHeTX-M?usp=sharing

UPDATES

Part II of Remote Viewing 3I/Atlas has now been posted: https://www.adventuresinremoteviewing.com/post/remote-viewing-3i-atlas-part-ii

and 3I/ATLAS Was Predicted (And What NASA Isn't saying)

9/5/2025

3I/Atlas Viewing Congruency Report now available.

The 3I/Atlas and Yellowstone projects are now featured in this Edge of Wonder Episode on Rise TV: https://rise.tv/episode/remote-viewing-3i-atlas-yellowstones-weird

9/3/2025

As covered on one of Brazil's most popular astronomy channels (be sure to like and subscribe):

See also:

The UPDATES PAGE: https://www.adventuresinremoteviewing.com/post/3i-atlas-updates

Remote Viewing 3I/Atlas Part II: https://www.adventuresinremoteviewing.com/post/remote-viewing-3i-atlas-part-ii

And: 3I/ATLAS Was Predicted (And What NASA Isn't saying)