Remote Viewing 3I/Atlas (Part II)
- John Adams
- Oct 4
- 8 min read
Updated: Oct 15
Remote Viewing Investigation of 3I/Atlas
Part II: A Two-Phase Speculative Analysis
Prepared by: John Adams
Date: October 1, 2025
Follow-up to August 2025 - Original Study
The current report is now available here: Part II Analysis Report
(Please link to and mention the site if using our materials)
Highlights of the Report
Two independent remote viewing studies: August & September 2025
9 total viewers across two phases
Strong convergence in Phase I and II across viewer data
Multiple post-session astronomical discoveries align with viewer descriptions
Timeline supports potential precognitive elements
Additional predictive viewer sessions from 2023-2025 show related phenomenon
Additional "open search" viewer session may help provide future insights
Research Methodology | Quality Controls |
Viewers received only numerical target designations No contextual information provided during sessions Sessions conducted independently Multiple viewer groups across different time periods | Experienced remote viewing practitioners Independent session documentation Standardized remote viewing protocols |
Background
NOTE ON METHODOLOGY AND INTENT
The report presents a speculative analysis based on remote viewing protocols conducted in a blinded, two-phase format. While care was taken to minimize bias and assess convergence across sessions, the impressions shared here are exploratory in nature. They are not intended as empirical claims, but rather as symbolic and intuitive reflections that may offer new perspectives on the mystery of 31/ATLAS. Readers are invited to engage with curiosity, discernment, and an open mind.
DISCUSSION
The involvement of remote viewers in studying 31/Atlas adds a separate layer of intrigue in the ongoing mystery of 31/Atlas. While remote viewing is generally considered speculative, the fact that multiple teams with good track records have independently perceived it as artificial is noteworthy. Remote viewing, as a practice, has been used to gather information about distant or hidden targets using so-called paranormal means. Although not widely accepted, there have been instances where remote viewing has provided insights that were later corroborated by empirical evidence. In the case of 31/Atlas, the consistent perception of an artificial nature across different remote viewing sessions suggests there might be something to these observations. The remote viewing findings align with some of the anomalous characteristics of 31/Atlas, such as its unusual composition, trajectory, seemingly anomalous presence of metal, brightening, polarization and the absence of non-gravitational acceleration, etc. The object's alignment with the ecliptic plane and the presence of nickel with little to no iron are also details that could support the idea of technological origin. However, we do need to approach the results with caution. While they provide an additional perspective, they don't constitute actual proof right now. The true nature of 31/Atlas will likely be determined by empirical observations and analyses. We can expect some level of verification in the coming weeks and months. The upcoming observations, especially with Mars’ orbiters and the close-up imagery from the HiRISE camera, will be an important ingredient in providing concrete insight into the nature of this object. The observations may help us determine whether the remote viewing perceptions align with physical reality or are merely coincidental or an anomaly in and of itself. In the meantime, the scientific community continues to study 31/Atlas using conventional methods, insisting on the classification of comet vs. interstellar object. Whether it turns out to be a comet, a natural but exotic celestial body, or something more extraordinary, the study of 31/Atlas promises to expand our understanding of the universe and the possibilities within it.
AVI LOEB’S SCALE
Given the information available so far, Loeb's rating of "four" on the Loeb Scale seems both cautious and reasonable. The rating highlights the object's anomalous nature while acknowledging the need for obtaining more concrete evidence. If future observations reveal additional anomalies or appear to confirm the artificial nature of 31/Atlas, Loeb's rating would likely increase. Conversely, if the object is found to have natural explanations for its unusual characteristics, the rating would likely decrease. Give the body of remote viewing sessions, we tend to lean slightly higher than 4 while still remaining cautious and neutral. For now, though, a"4" is a balanced assessment that reflects the current state of knowledge about 31/Atlas, while leaving the door open for future analysis and classification.
Confirmed Anomalies (as of September 2025)
Third confirmed interstellar object
Pre-discovery activity detected May 7, 2025
Nickel composition (at first no iron detected, now changing anomalously)
Green glow despite lack of typical volatiles
Anomalous mass and size
Hyperbolic trajectory (~58 km/s)
Rapid brightening patterns
Non-ionized tail structure
Forward facing tail - possible light or spray phenomenon
Ongoing "almost daily" new discoveries
Cross-Phase Convergence Analysis
Unified Themes Across Both Studies
Artificial Construction: Manufacturing indicators, industrial materials, technological systems
Sophisticated Camouflage: Advanced concealment, disguise as natural object
Complex Architecture: Multi-layered internal networks, tubular systems
Energy Manipulation: Directional projection, propulsion systems
Intelligence Operations: Observational capabilities, strategic behavior
Timeline Correlation Analysis Discovery
How the sessions stack up so far
Possible Correlations
Drawing Highlights
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 | ||
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 |  |  |
 | |  |
Sessions:
Sessions for four remote viewers: Remote Viewing 3I/Atlas Part II Remote Viewing
Whiteboard Session:
David Powell's Remote Viewing 3 I Atlas Full Whiteboard session
Methodological Considerations
Potential Strengths
Blind protocols maintained
Multiple independent viewer confirmation
Specific technical detail convergence
Potential Limitations
Information leakage: Access to preliminary scientific discussions
Selection bias: Focus on matches vs. non-correlations
Interpretation flexibility: Retrofitting data to observations
Archetypal access: Consistent cultural patterns
Alternative Explanations
Non-Paranormal Possibilities
Coincidental pattern matching
Unconscious information integration
Collective unconscious access
Viewer or analysis confirmation bias
Paranormal Possibilities
Genuine remote viewing
Precognitive elements
Non-local consciousness
(Both interpretive frameworks remain viable and require continued investigation.)
Further Discussion
The sessions remind us again of controlling forces and conquerors mentioned in phase I. An emissary or viceroy is often alluded to, perhaps a figurehead in this mystery. Not only is the object described as intentionally camouflaged, but some have reported blocking efforts. Still others like John Dixon reported an object as not fully perceptible to this 3D realm. Some, like David , also described it as invisible.
Dano maintained he was not able to be blocked when looking on the inside. He drew the image of a creature who eerily chimed "Hello Daniel, I've been expecting you". Interestingly, he stated that they were afraid of the outcome (perhaps relating to their plan).
David wrote of something cleansed from the record and scrubbed footage, something others have speculated on in relation to 3I/Atlas. The object was described as having a labyrinth of mazes. This echoes what others have described, like Viewer A who described it much like a termite nest of interweaving tunnels.
John Dixon drew a manmade object. It was decorated, as some others have described. He wrote: "Lime Green and really bright white light coming from the inseams of the man made seal points. The seals/seams remind me of those 3D puzzles. The pieces of the puzzle are (a) hexagon pattern. White light, turns green when exposed to oxygen? Or heat process of metallics of the layers. " He went on to describe various different metals in layers in another drawing and what may have been a process of metallic vaporizing.
Open Search and Future-looking Sessions
Independent from the Study
Sketches
 |  |  |
 |  |
Open Search Session:
Session File: Open Search September 12 2025
On page seven a strange character emerges, like a wise trickster. He seems to symbolize a changing of norms, chaos (traffic jams, putting a mess back together, etc.), hidden truths revealed, and magic. This unusual figure is said to represent newness, talent, wisdom and playfulness, as we observe a carousel horse with the phrase "living fun at the carousel." This potential new paradigm, mentioned in other viewer sessions, suggests the emergence of a "new kingdom".
In the end, the session resonates with something overall captivating: collective awakening, natural processes, enchantment, adventure. It's like a "performance", with new dimensions, grand design, beauty, success, and an emerging celestial architecture.
It echoes through in other sessions as well with phrases from David's like peace in our time, behold the spirit within, bathed in light, aura, equality, and enlightened vitality.
In this whimsical vein, a proposed Tarot card:
Le Royaume Emergent - The Emerging Kingdom
Divinatory Meaning:
Upright: A moment of awe and transition - new awareness emerges through playful chaos. The veil between dimensions thins.
Reversed: Confusion, misdirection, or institutional resistance. The signal is distorted by expectation or fear
A green-glowing interstellar object moves across the crystalline sky. Below is a carnival of masked figures and a frozen palace rising from mist. Meanwhile a trickster scatters glyphs across a bridge between worlds.
Forward-looking sessions:
Highlights from the session on July 2 2025: The next major con-event
These additional sessions ask the question was this object predicted as far back as 2023, could leaders be holding back on what they know, and might we be headed toward future changes?
Conclusions
The aim of the study was to continue analyzing the object through the speculative approach of remote viewing with new targeting adjustments to eliminate all "noise" and "idle chatter" surrounding the subject. The primary goal was to determine whether the object is natural or artificial. Despite such well-intentioned efforts, there is always the possibility of error, bias and other pitfalls as previously noted.
It is noteworthy, however, that convergence occurs not only across viewer sessions in two phases but also within other trained remote viewing circles using established protocols and methodologies, which have subsequently supported the data. Alongside the 9 viewers, I have highlighted future sessions, an "open search", and one whiteboard session. Lastly, but not mentioned, I monitored a virtual reality remote viewing session in early September with some interesting results. Although the session was permanently lost, the notes remained useful.
While the sessions in Phase I and II did conjure some images of negativity, there were also reflections of positivity, hints around paradigm shifts, and sentiments of new beginnings in the future. If this perceptual body of data proves to be even somewhat accurate, we might be in for an intriguing ride around the existential carousel. Will the object prove to be just a comet, an exotic body, or some artifact floating beyond solar winds never to be heard from again?
As always, stay tuned for more updates.
Update 10/5/2025:
The Perseverance Rover on Mars has taken a photo. I enhanced the image while seeking to preserve the content and came up with one of the better close-ups. It doesn't look to have a tail, though - go figure. We are still waiting for NASA and the European Space Agency to release its Mars fly-by footage.
Funny coincidence: it's interesting to note that Avi Loeb also came up with an artificial rating system around the same time as the one listed in the report above. This one - actually a detection and response scale - was originally a 1-10 scale too, l but I changed it to a tentative 1-6.
Update 10/8/2025:
Latest Observational Update
Recent analysis continues to reveal unusual characteristics of 3I/ATLAS as it approaches perihelion:
Periodic Variations Detected: Preliminary analysis published in Astronomer's Telegram #17437 reports potential periodic variations in both positional observations and brightness measurements. Researchers analyzing observational data (O-C residuals) identified a possible 4 ± 2 hour period in positional deviations, with corresponding photometric variations showing a 2-hour period. These findings are based on observations taken when the comet's heliocentric distance fell below 4 AU.
Key points to remember:
Reported periods have significant uncertainty
Preliminary findings need independent verification
Natural explanations include complex rotation, asymmetric outgassing, or common cometary tumbling
Mars Orbital Observations:Â ESA's ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO) captured imagery of 3I/ATLAS using its CaSSIS camera during the October 3 Mars flyby. The resulting animation shows apparent structural variations in the object's appearance as it was tracked across multiple frames.
Here is a capture of the footage (captured Oct1-Oct7) I enlarged at 8x when it became available:
However, some important factors must be considered when interpreting these images. First, CaSSIS is meant for Mars surface imaging, not deep-space objects 30 million km away.
3I/ATLAS showed more variation than background stars, indicating real changes. Variations could result from outgassing, rotating features, structural asymmetries, or other cometary behaviors.
The findings are preliminary but natural explanations include complex rotation, asymmetric outgassing, or tumbling.
As 3I/ATLAS passed Mars on October 3, and approaches its closest point to the sun, multiple spacecraft and telescopes continue monitoring for additional data. The object will be behind the Sun from Earth's perspective through late October before re-emerging in November for follow-up observations but we are still waiting to see what NASA and other agencies have captured, particularly with the HiRISE orbiter which schould offer the best imagery.
The Remote Viewing Correlation:Â Interestingly, earlier remote viewing sessions independently reported perceptions of "fast rotational motion" and complex internal dynamics prior to these observational reports. While it is correlational, it remains noteworthy as we await further verification.
For more updates follow the 3I/Atlas Updates page
and also see the post 3I/ATLAS Was Predicted (And What NASA Isn't saying)