3I/ATLAS Was Predicted (And What NASA Isn't Saying)

Seeing Before Discovery

Remote Viewing 3I/ATLAS and Institutional Response Patterns

Principal Investigator: John Adams

Report Date: October 13, 2025

Study Period: September 2023 - July 2025

Read The Report: Available Here

Summary

Two independent remote viewing session series, conducted between 21 months and 1 day relative to the discovery of interstellar object 3I/ATLAS (C/2025 N1), demonstrate statistically significant correlations with subsequent astronomical observations and institutional response patterns. The goal was to target the future as a series of related events rather than a shifting and arbitrary time window. These sessions were conducted under blind protocols with documented temporal precedence, providing verifiable predictions that continue to unfold.

Critical Timeline

Sept 23, 2023

Target 92323-1 describes fast-moving celestial body with magnetic properties

Dec 5, 2023

Target 92323-2 reinforces observations, emphasizes tracking and coordination

July 1, 2025

3I/ATLAS discovered by ATLAS survey

July 2, 2025

Target MJ 1152 (blind) perceives NASA mission control operations

Most Compelling Evidence

Session MJ 1152, conducted approximately 24 hours after discovery using blind protocol, produced specific operational details including:

• NASA mission control environment and tracking systems

• Cultural reference to film Meteor (1980)

• Data processing urgency

• Information concealment themes

• Multiple coordination points

• Vertical, shift, alignment, plan, observation, complete control, emotional rebuttals.

• Eye in the sky. Clouds. Isolation.

• A monitoring type screen drawn large. The screen is labeled "interface/screen, "arc system", area tracked or observed, flow and tracking, calibration, flow electronics".

• Waviness pattern, elliptical ("like an orbit"), establish, cloud compute and track, mission control (circled for emphasis)

• Challenge--> Recognize--> improvise

• There are waves of emanation, like gravity waves. They may offer a signature or movement to capture.

• Black lines: motion, quadrant, sector, visibility, tracking, audio controls.

• "Roll out the numbers"

• Take the data, run and compute or take charge, or act/scramble. Hurry.

• Issue statements and declarations among many.

• Echoes repeating paradigm shift themes found in the later remote viewing

  
  

These perceptions align precisely with current reality: As of October 2025, NASA has not released high-resolution HiRISE imagery from the October 3 Mars flyby despite advance planning and public interest, with no timeline or explanation provided. Further, there is no real discussion regarding what should be considered an anomalous number of comets in and near our inner solar system. Could this speak to other dynamics at work at the outer solar system of significance?

Statistical Significance

Probability of randomly generating these specific correlations by chance: approximately 1 in 300,000 (preliminary calculation based on independent probabilities of component matches).

What This Means

Documented temporal precedence (sessions before events)

Blind protocols maintained (no front-loading)

Specific operational details (not vague predictions)

Short verification timeline (months, not decades)

Ongoing falsifiability (HiRISE data will eventually emerge)

Current Verification Status

Verified Correlations

• ✓ Fast-moving interstellar object detected

• ✓ NASA/multi-agency tracking operations

• ✓ Unusual data withholding patterns

Awaiting Verification

• HiRISE data release and content

• Institutional explanations for delays

• Additional cometary activity predictions

  
  

Overview

This study analyzes two remote viewing session series conducted between September 2023 and July 2025, examining correlations with the discovery and institutional response to interstellar object 3I/ATLAS. All sessions employed blind protocols with documented temporal precedence. The report will provide all of the specific details.

Session Analysis

Target 92323: Fast-Moving Celestial Body

21-Month Temporal Precedence

Key Perceptions

• Rounded object celestial body moving like a bullet

• Fast, hot, magnetic nature with push/pull properties

• Thousands upon thousands, being tracked

• Ongoing discovery and coordination themes

• Multitudes. Gravitation. Norms.

• This feels like an event somewhere in the arc of time, maybe something nearing in the future. It is magnetic in nature. It has push/pull. It is flowing. There is some coordination.

• Mention of "Apophis" and "Apophos" as AOL

• Isolation mentioned 8+ times across sessions

• Going down the rabbit hole

• Obstruction, chaos,

• Movement, body, commotion, retrograde

• Timeliness, approach, appeasement

Correlation: Matches 3I/ATLAS hyperbolic trajectory at 26 km/s, speculation about technological properties, and unprecedented 17-comet clustering period (which is not being widely discussed).

Target MJ 1152: Institutional Response

1-Day Temporal Proximity (Blind Protocol)

Mission Control Environment

THE SMOKING GUN

Direct Quotes from Session:

• Mission control (circled for emphasis)

• Interface/screen, flow and tracking, calibration

• Arc system, area tracked or observed

• Mission Control, NASA feel

• Like the movie Meteor (1980)

One day after 3I/ATLAS discovery, viewer perceived NASA mission control operations and institutional coordination - without knowledge of the discovery. The Meteor (1980) reference perfectly captures governmental response to celestial objects.

Data Management Themes

• Roll out the numbers, run and compute, scramble, hurry

• Issue statements and declarations among many

• Take cover (concealment)

• Data moved to faraway and uncharted places

• Only faint trace left behind

  
  

Current Reality: NASA has not released HiRISE data from October 3 flyby. Only low-resolution CaSSIS images provided. No explanation or timeline given.

Paradigm Shift References

Multiple mentions of paradigm source, paradigm shift, and new beginnings suggest reality-changing implications beyond astronomical curiosity.

Correlation Analysis

Cross-Session Convergence

Themes appearing in BOTH session series:

Isolation

8+ mentions

Tracking

Extensive

Coordination

Emphasized

Fast Movement

Bullet, zoom

Magnetic

Push/pull

Paradigm Shift

Reality-changing

Pattern Analysis

The viewer appears to have perceived two distinct but related aspects:

Target 92323 (Pre-Discovery)

Perceived the phenomenon itself: fast-moving celestial body, tracking activity, multiple objects.

Target MJ 1152 (Post-Discovery)

Perceived institutional response: mission control operations, data management, concealment.

Statistical Assessment

Probability analysis of MJ 1152 correlations (conservative estimates):

• • NASA/Mission Control reference given con event target: ~5%

• • Timing (one day after astronomical discovery): ~0.3%

• • Specific operational details (tracking, data processing): ~10%

• • Concealment theme matching reality: ~20%

• • Specific cultural reference (Meteor 1980): ~1%

Combined probability: approximately 1 in 300,000

Assumes independence of events; actual probability may differ but order of magnitude remains significant.

Implications and Verification Timeline

If Correlations Hold Under Scrutiny

This study would represent compelling evidence for precognitive remote viewing because:

Temporal Precedence

Sessions documented 21 months and 1 day before/during events, posting online (2 sessions in 2023) and with handwritten timestamps.

Specificity

Not vague predictions but specific operational details matching institutional behavior.

Ongoing Falsifiability

HiRISE data will eventually be released, allowing verification of concealment hypothesis.

Verification Opportunities

Short-Term (Weeks to Months)

• HiRISE data release will confirm or refute concealment hypothesis

• Institutional explanations for delays (if provided) can be evaluated

• Additional observations of 3I/ATLAS post-perihelion

Medium-Term (Months to Years)

• Continued cometary activity monitoring (17-comet clustering pattern)

• 3I/ATLAS Jupiter flyby observations (March 2026)

• Replication studies with independent viewers

Long-Term (Years)

• Paradigm shift predictions (if 3I/ATLAS artificial nature confirmed)

• Pattern validation through future similar events

• Integration of findings into broader RV research

  
  

Conclusion

This study documents remote viewing sessions that appear to have perceived both an interstellar object before its discovery and the institutional response as it unfolded. The combination of documented temporal precedence, blind protocols, specific operational details, and ongoing verification opportunities makes this an unusually strong case for precognitive remote viewing capabilities.

One of the most remarkable aspects is the specificity of MJ 1152, conducted one day after 3I/ATLAS discovery under blind protocol. The viewer (myself) perceived not vague impressions but concrete operational details of institutional coordination and information management that precisely match current reality months later.

So the question remains, why the silence and what about any discussion of notable increased cometary activity in and near the inner solar system?

While limitations exist (self-targeting, single viewer, post-hoc analysis), the documented temporal precedence and ongoing falsifiability distinguish this from typical retrofitted correlations. The ultimate test will come as predicted events continue to unfold and the HiRISE data eventually emerges.

The full remote viewing sessions can be seen here.

If you haven't already, check out the 3I/Atlas Remote Viewing Project parts I and II and the 3I/Atlas updates page.