TechnoMystic: AI and the Soul’s Crossroads
- John Adams
- Jul 13
- 13 min read
The Project
The goal of this project was to look at Elon Musk, his involvement with AI, and government using remote viewing. In addition to getting into the mind of the person, it also allowed us a window into unfolding AI and technology at large. The blind target for this project was "Elon musk/ultimate goals with AI and his position in government", with the knowledge the target does contain a subject/person. For this, three viewers were used: Patricia H, Morgan Farrell, and John Dixon. Additionally, I have referenced some NDE's (near death experiences) about the future that have been documented on YouTube (listed at the end).
Background
Elon Musk is a South African-born American entrepreneur who has founded or co-founded several major companies that have significantly impacted technology and various industries. He is currently the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX and Neuralink and owns the social media platform X. He also founded The Boring Company, an infrastructure and tunnel construction company, and xAI, an artificial intelligence company focused on building a generative AI program, most recently having released the powerful Grok 4.
Musk is widely heralded for his visionary thinking, entrepreneurial drive, and ability to disrupt established industries. These include the electric vehicle revolution, space exploration, and a commitment toward sustainable energy with his involvement in Tesla and the acquisition of SolarCity which showcase a dedications to developing and deploying renewable energy solutions.
Despite his accomplishments, Musk has faced criticisms, particularly in recent years. Some of the most prominent and legitimate criticisms include Controversial Management and Communication at X, AI Chatbot Controversies, Political Involvement and Statements, Concerns about Neuralink's Animal Testing, Intense Work Culture and Micromanagement
Interestingly, Musk's grandfather was a technocrat who published books like "International Conspiracy to Establish a World Dictatorship".
Patricia H's Session
Patricia saw a male figure in her session with a “rectangular face,” “large mouth,” someone “tall,” with “strange hairs”. This person displayed emotional detachment, seemingly disconnected emotionally, driven by purpose but not entirely sure why or as to the implications.
This figure was part of two large projects:
Project #1: To create a new protected or hidden energy flow using something “liquid.”
Project #2: To develop a “gold” derived from “air”—a metaphor for a non-tangible, high-value concept, such as that of cryptocurrency and exchange perhaps.
Other Themes
Social Isolation: There is reference to trust in his wife but otherwise feeling “alone,” and surrounded by manipulation or unclear relationships.
Future Strategy: Suggestions of needing “secret relationships” and undisclosed tech—almost spy-like in tone, hinting at strategic shifts and long-term change.
Interpretation & Meaning
Symbolic language like “compressed air,” “industrial trash,” and “not emotionally touched” are present. We begin to see emerge:
—A transformation from grounded natural beginnings to synthetic, high-stakes ventures.
—A progression from innocence (childhood environment) to high-tech complexity and bureaucratic entanglement.
—The subconscious portraying Elon Musk as both innovator and pawn—someone managing one vision but having another controlled externally.
This may suggest that Musk’s public persona masks deeper entanglements with systems of control (e.g., AI regulation, military partnerships, or national security).
Category | Interpretation |
Emotional State | Isolation, disconnection, obsessive drive |
Technological Themes | Creation of new energy systems & intangible AI |
Governmental Dynamics | Hidden influence, strategic secrecy, manipulation |
Personal Relationships | Trust in few, disillusionment with many |
Reflection
Patricia wrote in her thoughts after the session:
"Take the age info of the person carefully, because at the beginning I was having something like 45 and then my mind came back and gave me 70-80 years old. It was like if there was the energy of two pretty closed people in the target. Main information is this person did engage in two important projects with huge potential impacts worldwide. For one project, this person has full power on it, knows everything and manages people and resources. For the second one, the project is mostly under control of another person, meaning that this person who is the target doesn’t have full control and power on the project, doesn’t know everything, doesn’t have a full overview on it, and don’t know all stakeholders and resources (financial, logistical, human resources). Today this person is feeling confused because it’s like if this person is just figuring out that choices he did before wasn’t a good choice and telling to himself "it’s too late, I cannot go back, and I can only go forward". He is sorry about consequences and he is feeling confused. This is the main information about this person, very strong perception, feeling of confusion and those two huge projects with worldwide impact. In the meantime, there is a perception of shift coming now/afterwards/or next coming months. This shift is like if there is a new paradigm where all energy put in those projects were not worthy, like if it was for nothing, because it will have less value in coming months due to this new paradigm.
It seems to be as if people will have more power. Perception of a lot of people coming in with a huge sense of energy. Energy of all those people is creating like a reverse effect so it’s like if it prevents bad issues for those two projects, or more precisely both these projects will not go to the end because there is like a reverse movement. It seems this target person will have some trouble in the coming months and weeks because it’s like this person had big dreams and big projects and it’s like if this person were thinking that everything would be easy, but in fact, it will not be so easy and it’s like if this person didn’t realize that maybe there was more information to take care about, more people to take care about as well more opinion to take care about. Personality of the target people is like someone with no empathy, with no anticipation about consequences, with no anticipation about needs/effects and consequences."
The session paints a portrait of someone driven but emotionally detached, ready to dive head long into progress. The subject later realizes the wider implications and struggles of power while enduring some confusion and senses that it may be too late (with AI, et al). There is mention of a new project and change. Could this be Grok 4, which was already announced a few months after the sessions? And could there be a new form of energy or break through project in the future?
There are references to “liquid” energy flow and “air-based” value creation, which could symbolize intangible assets like data, influence, or intellectual capital.
It mentions manipulation, strategic bases, and undisclosed technology hinting at covert alliances and future-impacting projects shielded from the public. In a way, this feels like an allegorical map—a layered psychic interpretation of one person’s energy entangled in forces larger than himself. It portrays innovation as both salvation and burden, and it reflects on how visionary pursuits can isolate even the most powerful minds.
The emotional tone implies a crossroads: a need to reconcile ambition with meaning, secrecy with transparency, and technology with humanity. In that sense, it becomes a sort of critique of the modern Prometheus myth.
Morgan's Session
A multi-layered session that points to a hooded female figure seeking help, shifting then to broader visions of ritual, construction, urban decay, AI, and existential suppression. Its themes spiral through landscapes both natural and artificial—touching on mysticism, surveillance, groupthink, and technological imposition.
Session Summary
In his summary, Morgan wrote the following:
Target is a person and seems to be female. This person appears as a shrouded figure, hooded or robed. They seem to be beckoning; they are looking for help. People ‘show up’ in response, to help. They become ‘enamoured’ with this person - not quite to the point of ‘worship’ but they believe, they are enthralled. This seems borderline ‘cult-like’. This is occurring in an outdoor setting, a natural landscape near something like a ‘small mountain’ or prominent rock formation. People are compelled to assist with something here. This is happening at sunset (AOL - sunrise) and seems somewhat ‘ritualistic’. This has something with helping to ‘build’ something like a new society. The primary figure has dark hair, wavy-curly, dark eyes, and ‘sharp’ features. This event is described as prominent, but small-scale; it is not famous, not well-known. Something about this is associated with the colour purple or violet, reminding me of gemstones. Further exploration was performed on the idea of “helping to ‘build’ something like ‘a new society’” which describes a scenario involving a series of structures in a contained area. It is laid out in a grid pattern, and reminds me of ‘brutalist architecture’. There are EIs present here, that of being existentially ignorant, while I feel repressed. “The purpose of ” - this prompt shows the presence of some people who are moving around in somewhat of a ‘synchronized’ fashion. They feel focused and mission-oriented. There is something conceptual about all of this, the idea being that of attempting to ‘elevate’. This seems to involve some low-tech machinery, reminding me of the ‘Luddites’. S6 describes some people who all seem the same. It’s as though they have been stripped of their potential, something akin to ‘communist brainwashing’. There is an idea of blank faces staring, faces of death. These are true believers; they really think they’re doing something. They live in a small city or town, like a ‘low-tech smart city’. Ultimately, they are contained by their own beliefs.
Core Themes & Symbolism
Element | Interpretation |
Hooded Woman / Beckoning | Archetypal “caller”—a symbol of distress or transformation inviting assistance |
Enthralled Followers / Cult-like | Represents influence, charisma, perhaps the allure of tech personalities |
Building a New Society | Suggests transition—construction of something post-traditional or post-human |
Purple/Violet Association | Symbolic of mystery, spirituality, and psychic energy |
Brutalist Architecture / Enclosed Spaces | Symbolizes repression, conformity, industrialization |
AI Suppression / Automata | Alludes to biological engineering, dehumanization, and cognitive control |
Smart City / Communist Brainwashing | A chilling metaphor for surveillance, illusion of freedom |
Psychic Layers and Tone Shifts
Natural Terrain → Chemical Urbanism: The movement from rock formations to “dirty streets” and “dank factories” could imply the tension between nature and synthetic systems—perhaps a subconscious critique of technological expansion.
Energetics and Emotion: Descriptions like "rattling voices," "whooshing," and "acrid" paint an atmosphere thick with agitation, noise, and emotional disruption.
Group Synchronization: Repeated imagery of people moving “in unison,” stripped of identity, resonates with concerns about AI-driven behavioral conformity or ideological control.
Expanded Symbolism: Society as Ceremony
Morgan’s summary wraps the social shift in ritualistic tones: sunset gatherings, emotional elevation, synchronized movement. This aligns with the idea that major technological and ideological shifts might be subtly spiritualized—where tech leaders are elevated to near-mythical status and their followers enact subconscious ceremonies of belief.
The use of “brutalist architecture,” “grid layout,” and low-tech machinery invokes a paradox: the future isn't high-tech glitz but a return to industrial forms—suggesting emotional suppression masked as progress.
Social Containment & Ideological Homogeneity
The phrase “they are contained by their own beliefs” is especially powerful—it frames ideological submission as self-imposed. Morgan’s vision of blank faces and synchronized motions reflects a psychic critique of collective numbness in the age of smart cities and algorithmic governance.
This mirrors Patricia’s male subject who confides in his significant other while emotionally untouched—highlighting the personal cost of strategic genius and embracing a life’s great work.
What It Might Mean Psychically
Taken together, these sessions might be suggesting that innovation could enter a shadow phase. Not because of AI’s surface functionality, but due to what it could potentially suppress: individuality and emotional depth, transparency and spiritual clarity, organic relationships and natural wisdom.
The shrouded woman could indicate a dual self at odds with the technocratic future and its reality. The followers may be indicating society’s struggle to identify truth in a web of ideology and mystified leadership in the future.
Reflection
This session feels like a psychic mirror to societal transitions: the interplay between individual agency and collective entrapment. Emblematically, the shrouded female figure could represent humanity’s plea for conscious evolution, while the people who arrive—enamored and ritualistic—may symbolize society’s vulnerability to charismatic technocratic leaders.
The “smart city” turns into a conceptual cage, where automation and ideology converge. What stands out most is not just fear of AI, but the loss of differentiation—the homogenization of thought, expression, and purpose.
Morgan's impressions suggest a spiritual-political crossroads where progress may cost authenticity—and where the tools we create (AI, architecture, government) shape the psyche in both illuminating and repressive ways.
John Dixon's Session
Across all three sessions, Musk emerges not just as a technocrat, but as a shape-shifting figure embodying dualities. Here he is the visionary hero vs emotional cipher, the innovator vs the pawn of power, and the charismatic leader vs manipulated catalyst.
He’s portrayed in the session as both the engineer of transformation who likes to focus on numbers in a creative way and emotionally cryptic like a “Rubik’s Cube”. There's a repeated thread now of concealed truth: a persona cultivated with precision, yet shielding a more vulnerable, scattered essence.
Archetype Of The Alchemical Visionary
Theme | Details & Symbolism |
Inner Complexity | Apprehension, emotional crypticism, introversion, displaced memory, scattered focus |
Heroic Identity vs Ego | Romanticized, charismatic, inflated sense of self, yet seeks validation through impact |
Shape-Shifter Traits | Presents “fool’s gold” persona—materialistic shine masking a hidden truth |
Emotional Suppression | Wide emotional capacity yet “holds a lot in”; childhood lacked nurturing structure |
Symbolic Personality Puzzle | Rubik’s Cube metaphor points to intentional emotional encryption |
Developmental Contrasts | Honest at core but conditional, possibly shaped by external influence or love ties |
Energetic Balance Issues | Masculine-feminine imbalance noted; repeated across other sessions |
These impressions sketch Musk as somewhat of a high-functioning enigma: brilliant, but emotionally imbalanced, driven by unmet needs, and filtered through layers of psychic encryption.
The “fool’s gold” metaphor illustrates that something may be different than how its surface appears, or it could refer to a foolish endeavor.
It raises an intriguing possibility: could the visionary persona be not just carefully constructed, but psychically curated—as if projecting brilliance but also compensating from a form of emotional misalignment?
All three viewers captured a sense of displacement, emotional ciphering, and symbolic power management. They hint that the target may operate in dualities: truth and illusion, love and control, innovation and suppression.
Energetic Balance and Spiritual Undercurrent
All three viewers intuit imbalance between masculine ambition and feminine support or suppression:
Patricia shows the man leaning on a sole emotional connection (his wife).
Morgan visualizes a hooded feminine archetype pleading for help—representing the silenced intuitive aspect of society.
Dixon reveals a symbolic imbalance on a scale—feminine energy outweighing masculine, yet unintegrated.
This might suggest the collective subconscious sees Musk not only as a technological pioneer but as someone whose energetic and emotional foundation will determine the fate of the systems he influences.
Comparative Themes Across All Sessions
Shared Concept | Patricia H | Morgan | John Dixon |
Isolation & Suppression | “Emotionally untouched”, Alone | Enclosed city, synchronized minds | Introverted, emotionally encrypted |
Influence & Charisma | Global-scale control | Cult-like follower dynamics | Romanticized figure with leadership ambition |
Symbolic Energy Work | Liquid energy, air gold | Rituals, grid layouts | Radiology, body conditioning, yoga |
Ambiguous Ethics | Manipulative trust dynamics | Ideological containment | Capable of lying for love or mission |
Hidden True Self | Fragmented time, displaced | Hooded woman as shadow | Fool’s gold, shape-shifter impression |
Technocracy & Control | Strategic future project | AI suppression, smart city | Memory shift, number focus |
At the heart, these three sessions imply a sort of mythic blueprint: A Promethean figure with brilliant fire in hand, standing on unstable earth, caught between creation and control. He's portrayed as both disruptor and disrupted—someone driving humanity forward, while battling internally shaped by an emotional void and external manipulation.
Neuralink
In recent news, Neuralink filed trademarks for these terms, signaling ambitions far beyond medical applications. These filings were made on an “intent-to-use” basis, meaning Neuralink plans to commercialize these capabilities. While initially aimed at helping people with paralysis or blindness, the language in the applications suggests broader ambitions—possibly enabling human-to-human telepathic communication, mind-controlled robotics, and enhanced perception.
Term | Intended Function |
Telepathy | Brain-to-brain or brain-to-device communication—controlling software via thought |
Telekinesis | Controlling physical objects with thought—mind-powered interaction with machines3 |
Blindsight | Restoring vision by stimulating the visual cortex directly |
NDE Vision: Brain Implants and Spiritual Disconnection
A near-death experiencer reportedly foresaw a future where brain implants—like Neuralink’s—became widespread. In this dystopian vision, millions opted for implants, seeking enhancement and convenience over the natural state. Those who received them lost touch with their spiritual selves, becoming emotionally dulled or disconnected from intuitive awareness.
The implants were seen as technological filters, muting the soul’s voice and perhaps replacing it with algorithmic feedback and predictive dullness. This echoes concerns raised by religious and spiritual communities about transhumanism, free will, and the sanctity of consciousness.
In another NDE, the experiencer spoke to who he believed was Jesus. He warned him that this pursuit would kick off a spiritual battle—something planned for years—and that it would close off people spiritually.
Parallels to the Remote Viewing Sessions
The psychic impressions from Patricia, Morgan, and John Dixon eerily align with these developments:
Session Insight | Neuralink Parallel |
Emotional suppression & conformity | Morgan’s “smart city” and synchronized followers mirror AI-driven behavioral control |
Shape-shifting persona & false gold | Dixon’s “fool’s gold” metaphor reflects the seductive promise of enhancement |
Liquid energy & air gold projects | Patricia’s symbolic tech projects resemble Neuralink’s “Telepathy” and “Blindsight” ambitions |
Displacement & memory shift | Dixon’s view of scattered cognition aligns with fears of spiritual disconnection |
Hooded woman calling for help | Morgan’s archetype may represent the soul’s plea amid rising technocratic dominance |
These sessions seem to intuitively grasp the psychospiritual tension between innovation and identity. Neuralink’s vision of seamless mind-machine fusion, or future ones like it well-intentioned as they may be, may offer empowerment—but also risks flattening the multidimensional human experience into something mechanized and programmable.
Smart Cities and Technocratic Illusion
Together, these symbols conjure a portrait of AI governance as seductive yet suppressive—a technocratic Eden where individuality fades into ideological grids.
AI as Automaton Society: Morgan’s synchronized people represent AI-guided behavioral homogenization.
Governmental Power Projection: Patricia’s “external force” controlling one of Musk’s projects shows top-down influence.
Technocratic Illusion: Dixon’s emphasis on charisma and false shine signals a potential façade of innovation masking manipulation.
There's a potential psychic warning embedded here: visionary technologies may be the next carriers of mass psychological suppression unless grounded in authentic emotional and ethical balance.
The convergence of psychic symbolism, trademark filings, and NDE prophecy suggests a collective subconscious grappling with a possible future where thought becomes more like code, and emotion becomes data. Spiritual intuition may be overridden by algorithmic logic. The soul’s voice risks being drowned out by the hum of neural feedback loops and cold data. Are we ready to embrace this idea ethically or are we still too naive with respect to spirituality, technology and the need for control?
The Direction We’re Heading: A Double-Edged Frontier
At the heart of this map lies a central question: Will technology elevate the soul—or eclipse it? The sessions seem to ask us: Can innovation be sacred? Can machines respect mystery?
Can we build augmentation without losing authenticity?
These aren’t answers to be found in patents or product launches—but in collective discernment. We’re at a cultural crossroads. One path leads to augmented cognition, precision medicine, and planetary problem-solving abilities. The other risks emotional numbing, loss of spiritual intuition, and centralization of power in machine-guided governance. And what determines which path we take? Ideally ethics, intent and truth.
Musk’s recent statements on Grok 4, which is being described as having superhuman capabilities—that the future of AI may be terrifying, yet he’d like to witness it in his lifetime—resonate with the Promethean archetype seen in these remote viewing sessions.
Like Patricia’s visionary producing "liquid energy" and "air gold", Musk’s role dances on the edge of creation and danger. Dixon’s “fool’s gold” suggests a romanticized hero—aware of the stakes but drawn to the spectacle. Morgan’s symbolic smart city shows the seductive nature of tech-driven progress, even when suppression lurks below.
Musk acknowledging fear while pushing forward mirrors a drive for control and curiosity, despite existential risk. It fits into the image of the lonely innovator wrestling with demons, both internal and systemic.
Final Reflection: Myth and Mission
His insistence that AI be anchored to truth is arguably his most spiritually aligned statement:
Truth combats the “false shine” seen in Dixon’s interpretation. It offsets Morgan's imagery of ideological conformity—restoring authenticity.
But defining “truth” in AI is more than data accuracy—it’s about ensuring machines mirror human integrity, transparency, and soulfulness. Without that, AI risks becoming too much a brilliant echo chamber of bias, illusion, and cold logic.
The sessions feel like a coded warning and invitation. We’re building gods—not just tools—and as creators, we must decide whether AI will reflect our best selves—or our broken fragments.
If Elon Musk wishes AI to be grounded in truth, then his work—and those like it—must also be grounded in emotional honesty, spiritual humility, and multidimensional consciousness. Otherwise, brilliance will lead to blindness, and technology restriction instead of freedom and empowerment.
Comments